Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 08:46

Thank you.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Is anyone up to have a little conversation?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
One of Pop’s Hottest Stars Posted a Risqué Album Cover. All Hell Broke Loose. - Slate Magazine
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
4 of the Healthiest Cooking Oils to Use—and 3 You Should Limit, According to Dietitians - EatingWell
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What are the latest developments in the tech industry?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
What is the appeal of vampire stories and why are they popular in various forms of media?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Quia quia unde harum qui quas.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.